Master10 Proprietary Question Bank - Automated scraping, spidering, or harvesting is strictly prohibited.
Indian Polity & Constitution25 Essential Exam Concepts
How Does a No-Confidence Motion Work in India? Rules, History & Facts
In India's Westminster-style parliamentary democracy, the executive branch derives its democratic legitimacy directly from the legislature and remains continuously accountable to it. The ultimate institutional tool through which the legislative branch asserts its supremacy and tests the political survival of the government is the No-Confidence Motion (known in Hindi as the Avishwas Prastav). Rooted in the core democratic principle that an executive may govern only as long as it commands the trust of the directly elected representatives of the people, the passage of a No-Confidence Motion automatically triggers the immediate collapse and resignation of the Union Council of Ministers, including the Prime Minister.
The constitutional foundation of this motion rests on Article 75(3) of the Constitution of India, which explicitly states: "The Council of Ministers shall be collectively responsible to the House of the People" (the Lok Sabha). Interestingly, the text of the Constitution does not explicitly mention the phrase "No-Confidence Motion." Instead, the procedural mechanism is codified under Rule 198 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. Because collective responsibility lies exclusively to the directly elected lower house, a No-Confidence Motion can be introduced, debated, and voted upon solely in the Lok Sabha; the Rajya Sabha (Council of States) has no constitutional power to entertain or vote on a No-Confidence Motion.
The procedure for moving a No-Confidence Motion involves strict parliamentary checkpoints. Any member of the Lok Sabha may submit a written notice to the Speaker before 10:00 AM on a sitting day. The motion cannot be targeted against an individual minister; it must be moved against the Council of Ministers as a composite whole. To prevent frivolous disruptions, the motion requires the leave of the House, meaning at least fifty members must physically stand in their places when the Speaker reads the motion. Unlike a Censure Motion, the mover does not need to state specific grounds or reasons. Once admitted, the Speaker must allot a day or days for debate within ten days. If, following debate, the motion is passed by a simple majority of members present and voting, the Prime Minister is constitutionally bound to submit the resignation of the government to the President of India.
High-yield conceptual summaries for competitive exams and rapid revision.
A No-Confidence Motion is a parliamentary procedure used by the opposition to test whether the ruling government retains the confidence of the Lok Sabha.
The constitutional basis of the motion is Article 75(3), which mandates that the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.
The Constitution of India does not explicitly use the term "No-Confidence Motion"; the mechanism is governed by Rule 198 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure.
A No-Confidence Motion can be introduced, debated, and voted upon ONLY in the Lok Sabha, never in the Rajya Sabha.
Rajya Sabha members cannot vote on a No-Confidence Motion, even if the Prime Minister is a member of the Rajya Sabha (such as Indira Gandhi in 1966 or Manmohan Singh).
The motion must be moved against the entire Council of Ministers collectively, and cannot be directed against an individual minister.
To be admitted, the motion requires the active support of at least 50 Lok Sabha members standing in their places when the Speaker reads the notice.
Notice of the motion must be submitted in writing to the Secretary-General of Lok Sabha before 10:00 AM on the sitting day.
The mover is not required to specify reasons or grounds for the motion (unlike a Censure Motion, which requires specific policy charges).
Once admitted, the Speaker must schedule the debate within 10 days from the date leave is granted.
The motion is decided by a simple majority of members present and voting in the Lok Sabha.
If the No-Confidence Motion is passed, the Prime Minister and the entire Council of Ministers must tender their resignation to the President immediately.
A Censure Motion differs fundamentally: it requires specific reasons, can target an individual minister, and does not mandate automatic government resignation if passed.
The first-ever No-Confidence Motion in Indian parliamentary history was moved in August 1963 by Acharya J.B. Kripalani against the Jawaharlal Nehru government.
The 1963 motion was defeated by an overwhelming margin of 62 votes in favor to 347 votes against.
Indira Gandhi faced the highest number of No-Confidence Motions in Indian history, successfully surviving 15 separate motions during her tenure.
Prime Minister Morarji Desai resigned in July 1979 during the course of a No-Confidence debate, before the final vote was called.
The government of Prime Minister V.P. Singh was defeated on a confidence vote in the Lok Sabha in November 1990 by 142 votes to 346.
In April 1999, the government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee fell by a historic margin of just 1 vote (269 votes to 270) on a confidence motion.
A government can voluntarily move a "Confidence Motion" (Trust Vote) to proactively demonstrate its majority on the floor of the House.
Defeat of the government on a major financial bill (like the Union Budget) is treated as equivalent to a vote of no-confidence.
Once a No-Confidence Motion is defeated, there is generally no statutory bar on moving another in a subsequent session, provided the Speaker admits it under Rule 198.