Master10
Law, Judiciary & Legal Awareness25 Essential Exam Concepts

Perjury & Giving False Evidence in Court: Legal Framework & Penalties Guide

Perjury is the grave criminal offense of intentionally giving false testimony or fabricating false evidence in a court of law or judicial proceeding while legally bound by an oath, affirmation, or express provision of law to state the truth. In legal philosophy, the judicial administration of justice rests entirely upon the premise that witnesses and litigants truthfully narrate facts. When an individual knowingly makes a statement that they know to be false, believe not to be true, or do not believe to be true, they strike at the foundational integrity of the judicial system. In India, perjury is categorized not merely as a private wrong against an opposing litigant, but as an offense against public justice and the authority of the sovereign state.

In the Indian penal framework, perjury is codified under Chapter XI of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and corresponding chapters of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS). Section 191 of the IPC (Section 227 of the BNS) defines "Giving false evidence," covering verbal declarations, written statements, and sworn affidavits. Section 192 of the IPC (Section 228 of the BNS) defines "Fabricating false evidence," encompassing the creation of false circumstances, bogus entries in documents, or counterfeit electronic records to mislead an inquiring judge. Under Section 193 of the IPC (Section 229 of the BNS), intentionally giving or fabricating false evidence in any stage of a judicial proceeding is punishable with rigorous imprisonment of up to seven years and a mandatory monetary fine; in non-judicial proceedings, the penalty extends to three years imprisonment.

Unlike ordinary criminal offenses where any citizen can lodge a First Information Report (FIR), perjury prosecutions are governed by strict procedural safeguards codified under Section 195(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) (Section 215 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). Section 195 bars any court from taking cognizance of perjury offenses except upon a formal written complaint signed by the concerned court itself or its superior court. Under Section 340 of the CrPC (Section 379 of the BNSS), the presiding judge conducts a preliminary inquiry and must form a reasoned opinion that a prosecution is expedient in the interest of justice. The Supreme Court of India has repeatedly emphasized that courts must not tolerate hostile witnesses or deceitful litigants who deliberately subvert truth, as unpunished perjury destroys public trust in the rule of law.

Essential Concepts & Key Facts

High-yield conceptual summaries for competitive exams and rapid revision.

  • Perjury is the criminal offense of deliberately giving false testimony or making false statements under oath in a legal proceeding.
  • The term "perjury" originates from the Latin "perjurium," meaning false swearing or violating an oath.
  • Under Indian criminal law, perjury is codified under Chapter XI of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("Of False Evidence and Offences Against Public Justice").
  • Section 191 of the IPC defines the offense of "Giving false evidence" (re-enacted as Section 227 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023).
  • An offense under Section 191 occurs when a person legally bound by oath or law to state the truth makes a statement they know or believe to be false.
  • Section 192 of the IPC defines "Fabricating false evidence," covering fraudulent document creation or false record entries (Section 228 of BNS, 2023).
  • Section 193 of the IPC prescribes the punishment for perjury: up to seven years of imprisonment and a fine for judicial proceedings.
  • For false evidence given in non-judicial proceedings, Section 193 IPC prescribes imprisonment up to three years and a fine.
  • Section 194 of the IPC prescribes capital punishment or life imprisonment for fabricating false evidence intended to cause conviction for a capital offense.
  • Section 195 of the IPC punishes false evidence intended to procure conviction of an offense punishable with imprisonment for life or seven years.
  • A private individual cannot directly file an FIR or criminal complaint for perjury in a police station.
  • Section 195(1)(b) of the CrPC (Section 215 of BNSS, 2023) bars courts from taking cognizance of perjury except on a written complaint by the presiding court.
  • Section 340 of the CrPC (Section 379 of BNSS, 2023) lays down the procedure where the court holds a preliminary inquiry before filing a perjury complaint.
  • Under Section 340 CrPC, the court must record a finding that prosecution is "expedient in the interest of justice" and not for private vengeance.
  • The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) requires all oral evidence in court to be direct and truthful.
  • Swearing a false statement in an affidavit filed before a court of law amounts to the offense of perjury.
  • Witnesses turning "hostile" by retracting statements given under Section 164 CrPC before a magistrate can face perjury proceedings.
  • Contempt of court proceedings can also be initiated alongside perjury if false statements obstruct the due administration of justice.
  • The Supreme Court of India in Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Marwah (2005) clarified the procedural boundaries of Section 195(1)(b) CrPC.
  • The primary purpose of punishing perjury is to protect public justice, preserve the dignity of courts, and deter deceitful litigation.

Related Knowledge Topics to Discover

Looking for more specific GK questions?

Search across all 0 Perjury: Giving False Evidence in Court, IPC, BNS & Judicial Justice questions or browse 52,789+ verified questions across 65 domains.

Open Interactive Search