Master10 Proprietary Question Bank - Automated scraping, spidering, or harvesting is strictly prohibited.
History & Civilization Cluster14 Verified Questions
Mughal Administration GK Questions & Answers
The Mughal administrative apparatus achieved structural maturity under Emperor Akbar (reigned 1556–1605 CE), combining centralized monarchical authority with military-bureaucratic hierarchy and systematic revenue assessment. Central administration operated through departmental ministers: the Mir Bakhshi oversaw military recruitment and payroll, the Diwan-i-Kul managed imperial finances, the Mir Saman directed royal karkhanas (workshops), and the Chief Qazi administered judicial affairs. Akbar structured provincial governance by partitioning the empire into Subas (provinces) headed by a Subadar (governor) and a provincial Diwan, which were further subdivided into Sarkars and Parganas.
The core institution of imperial administration was the Mansabdari system, introduced in 1571 CE. Every civil and military officer held a dual rank: Zat (determining personal hierarchy and salary scale) and Sawar (designating the mandated cavalry contingent). Mansabdars were remunerated through cash (Naqd) or revenue-yielding land assignments (Jagirs). Agrarian fiscal policy was revolutionized in 1580 CE by Finance Minister Raja Todar Mal through the Ain-i-Dahsala (Zabti system). This framework calculated state demand as one-third of average produce based on ten-year crop yields and price trends, classifying agricultural land into Polaj, Parauti, Chachar, and Banjar based on cultivation continuity.
High-yield conceptual summaries for competitive exams and rapid revision.
The Mansabdari system organized civil and military bureaucracy through dual numerical ranks: Zat (personal status) and Sawar (cavalry quota).
Mansabdars received compensation either through cash salaries (Naqdi) or revenue assignments over designated territories (Jagirdari).
Todar Mal's Ain-i-Dahsala (1580 CE) fixed land revenue at one-third of average produce based on ten-year yield and price indices.
Agricultural lands were classified into Polaj (annually cultivated), Parauti (fallow), Chachar (uncultivated 3–4 years), and Banjar (barren 5+ years).
Provincial administration divided the empire into Subas governed by Subadars, with parallel fiscal control exercised by provincial Diwans.
Showing 14 Curated Questions14 Total in Bank
1ID: GK-HIST-00515
hardMughal Dynasty
In the Mughal Mansabdari system, the dual numerical rank of 'Zat' and 'Sawar' was formalized during Akbar's 40th regnal year. What did 'Zat' specifically indicate?
Verified Explanation
In the Mansabdari system, 'Zat' determined the personal status, hierarchical standing, and basic salary of the noble, while 'Sawar' fixed the number of armed cavalrymen he was required to maintain.
2ID: GK-HIST-00645
hardMughal Dynasty
In Akbar's Mansabdari administrative framework, what did the dual rank designation 'Zat' and 'Sawar' specifically signify?
Verified Explanation
In the Mansabdari system, 'Zat' determined the personal rank, standing, and pay scale of the noble, whereas 'Sawar' represented the exact number of mounted horsemen the mansabdar was obligated to maintain.
3ID: GK-HIST-00139
hardMughals
Under the Mughal administrative Mansabdari system, the dual numerical rank designated as "Zat" and "Sawar" represented what respectively?
Verified Explanation
In the Mansabdari system reformed by Akbar, Zat determined the personal rank and salary tier of the noble, while Sawar dictated the number of cavalry horsemen maintained.
4ID: GK-HIST-00245
hardMughal Dynasty
Under the Mughal 'Mansabdari system' modified by Akbar in 1595–96, what did the dual ranks 'Zat' and 'Sawar' specifically signify?
Verified Explanation
Under Akbar's refined Mansabdari system, 'Zat' determined the noble's personal rank, court hierarchy, and baseline salary, while 'Sawar' fixed the exact quota of cavalrymen (cavalry troops) required for active military service.
5ID: GK-HIST-00345
hardMughal Dynasty
Under the Mughal Mansabdari system reformed by Akbar, what did the numerical rank designation 'Sawar' specifically indicate?
Verified Explanation
The Mansabdari rank was dual: 'Zat' determined the personal status and basic salary scale of the officer, while 'Sawar' specified the exact number of cavalrymen and horses to be maintained.
6ID: GK-HIST-00458
hardMughal Dynasty
In the Mughal Mansabdari system, what specific military obligation was denoted by the rank designation 'Sawar'?
Verified Explanation
In Akbar's dual-rank Mansabdari system, 'Zat' fixed the noble's personal rank, precedence, and salary, while 'Sawar' indicated the exact number of cavalrymen and horses he was obliged to maintain.
7ID: GK-HIST-00704
mediumMughal Empire & Regional Kingdoms
In the Mughal Mansabdari system institutionalized by Akbar, what did the dual rank 'Zat' and 'Sawar' represent?
Verified Explanation
The Mansabdari rank had two numbers: Zat established the officer's personal status in the imperial hierarchy and determined his salary, while Sawar fixed the exact number of mounted horsemen and horses (du-aspa sih-aspa) he was obligated to maintain for military service.
8ID: GK-HIST-00907
mediumMughal Empire & Regional Kingdoms
In the dual-rank Mansabdari system instituted by Akbar, what did the 'Sawar' rank specifically determine?
Verified Explanation
In Akbar's revised Mansabdari framework, a noble held two numerical ranks: 'Zat' and 'Sawar'. 'Zat' fixed his personal standing, court precedence, and base compensation, whereas 'Sawar' indicated the exact contingent of mounted cavalrymen the officer had to maintain for imperial service.
9ID: GK-HIST-00178
mediumMughal Dynasty
In the Mansabdari administrative system established by Akbar, what did the rank designation "Sawar" specifically denote?
Verified Explanation
In the dual rank system (Zat and Sawar), Zat indicated personal rank and remuneration, while Sawar specified the exact contingent of mounted horsemen the mansabdar was required to maintain.
10ID: GK-HIST-00395
hardMughal Dynasty
In the Mughal administrative framework, what did the dual ranks 'Zat' and 'Sawar' respectively indicate in the Mansabdari system?
Verified Explanation
Zat indicated the personal standing and base salary of the mansabdar in the imperial hierarchy, whereas Sawar designated the quota of mounted cavalry troops (cavaliers) the officer was required to maintain.
11ID: GK-HIST-00803
mediumMughal Empire & Regional Kingdoms
What modification did Emperor Jahangir introduce to the Mansabdari system through the 'Du-aspa Sih-aspa' rank?
Verified Explanation
Jahangir introduced the 'Du-aspa Sih-aspa' (literally 'two-horse, three-horse') provision into the Sawar rank. This allowed the emperor to double the military obligation and corresponding cavalry allowance of a trusted noble without raising his primary Zat rank, thus economizing state payroll expenditure.
12ID: GK-HIST-01007
hardMughal Empire & Regional Kingdoms
In Mughal agrarian revenue administration, what specific term was applied to a Jagir that was granted to a noble conditionally, tied to an official executive posting and non-transferable while holding that post?
Verified Explanation
Mughal revenue assignments (Jagirs) were classified into several types: 'Tankhwa Jagir' (standard transferable revenue assignment in lieu of salary), 'Watan Jagir' (hereditary, non-transferable lands held by Rajput and local rajas in their ancestral domains), 'Altamgha Jagir' (hereditary imperial charitable grants introduced by Jahangir), and 'Mashrut Jagir' (conditional revenue assignment granted to meet specific military contingencies or executive duties).
13ID: GK-HIST-00271
mediumMughal Dynasty
Under the Mughal administrative system, which official was in charge of military pay and recruitment?
Verified Explanation
The Mir Bakshi was the head of the military administration in the Mughal Empire, responsible for salary disbursements, intelligence, and the mansabdari system.
14ID: GK-HIST-00810
hardMughal Empire & Regional Kingdoms
In early modern agrarian historiography of the late Mughal Empire, what institutional phenomenon does Satish Chandra identify as the primary cause of the 'Jagirdari Crisis' under Aurangzeb?
Verified Explanation
Satish Chandra demonstrated that the annexation of the Deccan sultanates (Bijapur and Golconda) led to a massive influx of Deccani and Maratha aristocrats into the imperial mansabdari hierarchy. The supply of productive unassigned lands (paibaqi) fell critically short of claims (talab), causing intense factional struggle among nobles to secure lucrative jagirs and resulting in agrarian over-exploitation.
Search across all 14 Mughal Administration: Mansabdari System, Dahsala Land Revenue & Subas questions or browse 44,700+ verified questions across 65 domains.