Master10 Proprietary Question Bank - Automated scraping, spidering, or harvesting is strictly prohibited.
Indian Polity & Constitution18 Verified Concepts & Facts
Right to Privacy GK Guide: Puttaswamy Judgment, Article 21 & Proportionality Test
Academic Verification: Reviewed & mapped to NCERT, UPSC CSE & SSC CGL curriculum standards by the Master10 Editorial Board.Editorial Policy
In Indian constitutional law and human rights jurisprudence, the Right to Privacy is recognized as a fundamental constitutional entitlement protected as an intrinsic element of the Right to Life and Personal Liberty guaranteed under Article 21, and permeating the broader framework of fundamental freedoms enshrined in Part III of the Constitution of India. On August 24, 2017, a nine-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court of India delivered a monumental, unanimous verdict in Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, declaring unequivocally that privacy is not a mere common law privilege or statutory concession, but an inalienable, primordial natural right that inheres in every individual human being by virtue of human dignity.
The historic Puttaswamy ruling fundamentally transformed Indian constitutional jurisprudence by formally overruling previous decades-old judgments that had denied privacy constitutional status. Specifically, the nine-judge bench explicitly overruled the decisions in M.P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra (rendered by an eight-judge bench in 1954) and Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh (delivered by a six-judge bench in 1962) to the extent that those earlier benches held that the Indian Constitution did not protect an independent right to privacy. The apex court affirmed that privacy encompasses three foundational zones of protection: spatial and decisional privacy (guaranteeing personal autonomy over intimate choices including marriage, family, dietary preferences, and procreation), bodily privacy (protecting personal physical integrity and medical autonomy against invasive state incursions), and informational privacy (safeguarding personal data and shielding individuals from unauthorized surveillance).
While affirming privacy as a fundamental right, the Supreme Court clarified that it is not absolute and may be subjected to reasonable state regulation, provided such restrictions satisfy the rigorous Three-Fold Proportionality Test. To survive constitutional scrutiny, any state intrusion upon privacy must satisfy: legality (the measure must be backed by an authentic, existing legislative enactment), legitimate state aim (the restriction must serve a compelling public interest), and proportionality (the chosen method must exhibit a rational nexus to the objective, constitute the least intrusive means available, and avoid excessive infringement). This constitutional framework served as the direct catalyst for subsequent landmark verdicts decriminalizing consensual adult relationships under Section 377 and struck down the colonial criminalization of adultery, while laying the constitutional groundwork for the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
Test your recall of verified Right to Privacy: Article 21, Puttaswamy Verdict & Constitutional Jurisprudence exam facts. Rate your mastery to track revision.
Progress: 0/18 Rated 0 Mastered 0 Review Later
Concept 1 of 18
Key Concept #1
Can you recall the verified facts and syllabus significance for this concept?